The business rules management market isn’t just growing—it’s shifting. Organizations no longer treat rules engines as a developer library; they treat them as a strategic decision layer that drives customer-facing flows, compliance, and operational efficiency.

By the numbers:

• The global Business Rules Management System (BRMS) market was valued at approximately $1.64B in 2024 and is projected to reach $3.35B by 2032, growing at a CAGR of 8.6–12% (Grand View Research, SNS Insider).
• Cloud deployment captured 68.4% of the market in 2024—a clear signal that rule execution is moving from self-managed infrastructure to always-on, productized platforms.
• BFSI (banking, financial services, insurance) represents 43.6% of BRMS revenue, with risk and compliance accounting for 50.8% of market usage.
• Asia-Pacific is the fastest-growing region at 11.1% CAGR, while North America remains the largest market with 37.8% revenue share.

Why Teams Are Switching Away From Open Source Rule Engines

"Free" open-source rule engines often hide real costs. Here’s what the market data and adoption trends reveal:

1. Developer burden & opportunity cost:
   Simple rule changes with Drools, Nools, or similar engines typically require developer involvement, JIRA tickets, and sprint cycles. Organizations report that the "free" license masks high costs in developer time, maintenance, and infrastructure (DecisionRules, Nected).‍
2. Infrastructure overhead:
   Open-source solutions demand self-hosting, database management, scaling clusters, and security hardening. With DRAM prices surging ~171% YoY (Q3 2025) and server costs rising, the economics of self-hosted rule engines are becoming less attractive (Tom’s Hardware, The Register).‍
3. Enterprise requirements:
   Many open-source engines lack SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, and GDPR-ready architectures that enterprises need for customer-facing and mission-critical flows.‍
4. Shift to cloud-native & low-code:
   BT Group and Openreach (2024) adopted Camunda’s low-code platform to transform legacy systems at scale. Fortune 500 institutions across Banking, Insurance, Healthcare, and Logistics are moving to low-code rule and workflow platforms to accelerate delivery and reduce dependency on specialized developers.‍
5. Long-term TCO:
   Open-source rule engines can rarely be offloaded to non-technical users. They demand constant enhancements, architectural upgrades, and security patches—making them costlier over a 12–24 month horizon than managed, cloud-native alternatives.

Quick Comparison of All Platforms

Below is a comparison of Nected and the 10 open source rules engines on the parameters that matter most when evaluating alternatives to open source—especially for teams considering migration to a modern BRMS.

These parameters are derived from real-world selection criteria: change risk, integration risk, governance risk, and scale risk.

How AI Is Reshaping Rule Engines?

From Rules to Decision Intelligence

2025 marked the emergence of AI in rule engines; 2026 marks the shift to Decision Intelligence. According to industry research, 58% of new enterprise decision systems now integrate native AI capabilities, moving from process automation to transparent, agile, outcome-focused decision logic.

Market Data on AI + Decision Management

• Global AI spending is forecast to reach $1.3 trillion by 2029, with generative AI accounting for 56% as enterprises embed intelligence into decision-making (IDC).
• The business rules engine market reached $1.67B in 2025 and is projected to grow to $2.56B by 2034, partly driven by AI-augmented platforms.
• Early adopters report 12,000+ AI-driven recommendations monthly with 74% automatic acceptance rates—demonstrating tangible ROI from AI-assisted decisioning (IDC, Aeratechnology).

What AI Brings to Rule Engines

1. AI-assisted rule authoring – Natural language or conversational interfaces to define and refine rules without deep technical knowledge.
2. Explainability & compliance – Traceability of why a decision was made, critical for regulated industries.
3. Decision debt reduction – Extracting actionable rules from unstructured policy documents to ensure consistent application.
4. Human-in-the-loop – AI agents that perceive, decide, and act where appropriate while collaborating with humans on critical decisions.

Low-code platforms with native AI (e.g., Nected’s AI Copilot and AI Agents) are increasingly the default choice for teams modernizing decision logic.

Detailed Comparison: 10 Open Source Rules Engines

Below is an in-depth look at each engine, with Nected vs. competitor comparison tables in pure HTML, focused on the aspects that matter most when comparing Nected with that specific tool.

1. Drools

Drools is an influential and widely recognized open-source Business Rule Management System (BRMS) tailored for the Java ecosystem. It excels at the development and management of complex business rules, decision processes, and workflows, with integration to jBPM for process orchestration. Drools distinguishes itself with a comprehensive feature set that facilitates sophisticated rule and decision management, making it an established choice for enterprise-level applications across banking, insurance, healthcare, and logistics.

Key Features:

• Advanced rule engine supporting complex rule evaluation and decision logic
• Rete algorithm for efficient pattern matching and rule execution
• DMN (Decision Model and Notation) support for standardized decision modeling
• Decision tables for rule definitions, enabling structured rule authoring
• Real-time and batch processing capabilities
• Red Hat backing and integration with the broader KIE ecosystem

Pros:

• Robust and feature-rich environment for managing complex business logic
• Highly scalable, capable of handling large volumes of data and complex decision processes
• Strong community support ensures continuous improvement and extensive troubleshooting resources
• Flexible integration options with other Java-based applications and services
• Tools and interfaces accessible to both developers and business analysts (with technical setup)

Cons:

• Steep learning curve due to its comprehensive feature set and DRL (Drools Rule Language) syntax
• Java-centric design limits adoption for non-JVM technology stacks
• No native non-technical UI—rule management requires developer involvement or custom tooling
• High implementation and maintenance cost (build, deploy, and governance are largely manual)
• Rule management and deployment processes can be complex without proper governance frameworks

Drools vs. Nected

Drools is powerful for Java-heavy enterprises but requires significant technical investment. Nected offers a low/no-code alternative with governance, connectors, and managed deployment out of the box.

Read More: Drools vs Nected

2. Nools

Nools is a performant and user-friendly rule engine tailored for the Node.js ecosystem. It facilitates the definition and execution of complex decision-making logic in a JavaScript-like syntax, appealing to developers familiar with JavaScript and Node.js. Nools is particularly effective in scenarios that demand immediate rule evaluation and adaptive decision-making processes, offering a versatile solution for diverse applications—from simple to moderately complex systems.

Key Features:

• JavaScript-like syntax for intuitive rule definition
• Immediate, real-time rule evaluation and execution
• Support for forward chaining, enabling dynamic decision processes
• Easy integration with existing Node.js applications
• Designed with JavaScript developers in mind, leveraging familiar concepts

Pros:

• Highly accessible to developers familiar with the JavaScript ecosystem
• Efficient execution for complex decision-making scenarios
• Smooth integration with Node.js, allowing for a cohesive development experience
• Flexible in accommodating various rule definitions and management approaches
• Active community contributing to ongoing development and support

Cons:

• Documentation may not be as thorough or comprehensive as other engines
• Feature set might lack the breadth found in more extensive rule engines like Drools
• Predominantly suited for the Node.js environment, which may not align with all technical requirements
• Performance considerations for very large-scale or complex applications
• Rule management interfaces are less developed compared to more mature engines

Nools vs. Nected

Nools works well for Node.js-focused teams with moderate needs. Nected offers broader scalability, documentation, and non-technical usability.

3. GoRules

GoRules markets itself as an open-source business rules engine. The reality is more nuanced—and important for buyers to understand. GoRules operates as a dual offering: an open-source execution engine (ZEN) and a closed-source managed BRMS for rule authoring and management.

What’s actually open source: Only the ZEN Engine, the execution layer. Repositories like zen-go, zen (Rust core), and jdm-editor are MIT-licensed and run rules locally or self-hosted.

‍

What’s closed source: The GoRules BRMS (Business Rules Management System)—the no-code UI for authoring, versioning, testing, decision tables, and rule publishing is a closed-source, managed SaaS product. Teams must use GoRules Cloud (paid) or self-host proprietary components to get the full rule management experience.

The catch: Organizations often expect “open source” to mean a complete, self-hostable BRMS. With GoRules, you get an open-source execution engine but a closed-source, cloud-dependent management layer. For full control and transparency, you’d need to build your own authoring, versioning, and audit tooling around ZEN, which defeats the purpose of a managed BRMS.

Key Features (ZEN Engine only):

• Cross-platform rule execution (Node.js, Python, Go, Rust, Java)
• JSON Decision Model (JDM) for rule definition
• Decision tables, switch nodes, function nodes, and expression nodes
• MIT license for the execution layer
• Embeddable in applications or run as a standalone service

Pros:

• ZEN Engine is genuinely open source and vendor-neutral for execution
• High-performance Rust core with idiomatic bindings for multiple languages
• Free online editor available for designing decision models
• Self-hosted deployment option for the engine
• Active development and commercial backing

Cons:

• “Open source” claim applies to execution only—full BRMS is proprietary SaaS
• Non-technical rule authoring requires paid GoRules Cloud or proprietary components
• Limited audit trails, reporting, and maker-checker flows in the open-source layer
• Excel-like aggregated metrics and advanced governance only in paid tier
• Smaller community compared to established engines like Drools

GoRules vs. Nected

GoRules’ “open source” positioning applies to the engine, not the BRMS. Nected provides a unified, low-code rules + workflow platform with full governance, integrations, and transparency.

Read More: GoRules vs Nected

4. OpenL Tablets

OpenL Tablets is an open-source business rules engine and decision management system designed to bridge the gap between business requirements and software implementation. It centers on decision tables as the primary rule representation and includes OpenL Studio—a web-based rules editing and management environment—along with rule services (REST, Kafka, Java interfaces) and an enterprise-class rules repository using Git, databases, and blob storage.

Key Features:

• Business rules engine with decision tables as the core rule type
• OpenL Studio—web-based environment for rule authoring and management
• Rule services framework (RESTful APIs, Kafka, Java interfaces)
• Rules repository with Git, database, and blob storage support
• Condition and action columns supporting complex decision logic
• LGPL-3.0 license, allowing commercial use with certain distribution terms

Pros:

• Business-friendly decision tables, accessible to analysts with minimal technical knowledge
• Web-based UI reduces dependency on developers for rule changes
• Enterprise-oriented with support for versioning and deployment workflows
• Strong Java integration; rules can be invoked as Java methods with parameters
• Comprehensive documentation and reference guides

Cons:

• Java-centric design limits use for non-JVM technology stacks
• Moderate learning curve for advanced decision table configurations
• Limited native cloud-managed deployment—typically self-hosted
• Governance features (audit trails, maker-checker) require customization or add-ons
• Workflow orchestration and integrations need custom development

OpenL Tablets vs. Nected

OpenL Tablets is strong for Java teams using decision tables. Nected adds cloud-native deployment, workflow, AI, and lower implementation effort.

5. NRules

NRules is an open-source, flexible forward-chaining rules engine for .NET that aims to bring a powerful yet intuitive approach to rules execution in C# applications. It focuses on providing a robust framework for managing complex logic and decision-making processes, facilitating the development of dynamic, rules-based systems. NRules stands out for its expressiveness and efficiency, making it a suitable choice for developers implementing sophisticated rule-based solutions in the .NET ecosystem.

Key Features:

• Fluent API for defining rules, promoting readability and maintainability
• High-performance execution engine capable of handling complex scenarios
• Support for dependency injection, enhancing flexibility and testability
• Extensive tools for debugging and testing, ensuring reliability
• Forward-chaining inference for data-driven rule evaluation
• Active community offering guidance, support, and continuous improvements

Pros:

• Powerful and expressive syntax for rule definition, tailored for C# developers
• Capable of efficiently managing and executing complex decision logic
• Integrates seamlessly with .NET applications, leveraging existing .NET infrastructure
• Encourages clean architecture and separation of concerns through dependency injection
• Comprehensive debugging and testing tools aid in developing reliable applications

Cons:

• Steeper learning curve for those new to rules engines or NRules-specific syntax
• Documentation, while thorough, can be overwhelming for beginners
• Primarily focused on the .NET ecosystem, which limits cross-platform capabilities
• No visual UI for rule authoring—rules are defined in code
• No native workflow orchestration or governance features; these must be built separately

NRules vs. Nected

‍

NRules provides a sophisticated environment for developers within the .NET framework to build and manage complex rule-based applications. It offers a powerful suite of features designed to accommodate intricate decision-making processes. However, compared to Nected, NRules has a steeper learning curve and its documentation, while detailed, may not be as accessible to novices. Nected distinguishes itself with a more user-friendly low/no-code platform, broader documentation, and support network. Additionally, Nected's advanced user interface and cross-platform capabilities make it a more adaptable and intuitive choice for a wider audience, including those without extensive technical backgrounds. This makes Nected a preferable option for organizations looking for an efficient, scalable, and accessible rules engine solution.

6. json-rules-engine

json-rules-engine is a powerful, forward-thinking rules engine designed for Node.js applications, offering a unique approach to defining and managing rules using JSON. This engine is particularly appealing for projects that require dynamic rule configuration and external rule management, catering to both developers and non-developers who can read and edit JSON. It simplifies the integration of complex logic into applications, making it a popular choice for those implementing customizable, rule-based decision-making processes.

Key Features:

• Rules defined in a straightforward JSON format, enhancing readability and manageability
• Supports complex conditional logic, including "all","any", and "none" conditions for rule execution
• Easy integration with existing Node.js applications, allowing for flexible deployment
• Clean and intuitive API for rule evaluation and execution
• Dynamic rule loading from external sources, enabling runtime rule updates without redeployment

Pros:

• Highly accessible rule definition in JSON, understandable by both developers and non-developers
• Enables dynamic and external management of rules, supporting real-time updates
• Comprehensive support for complex logical conditions, catering to a wide range of use cases
• Seamless integration with the Node.js ecosystem, ensuring a smooth development experience
• Facilitates the creation of highly customizable and adaptable rule-based applications

Cons:

• Lacks a graphical user interface for rule management, potentially hindering less technical users
• Documentation, while sufficient, may not cover all advanced use cases comprehensively
• May require additional development effort to implement custom interfaces or integrations
• Performance in very large-scale environments needs careful consideration and testing
• Relies heavily on the structure and quality of JSON rule definitions, requiring meticulous attention to detail

‍

json-rules-engine vs. Nected

json-rules-engine is a solid dev-focused tool. Nected adds scalability, governance, and non-technical usability.

7. gRule Rule Engine

Grule is an open-source rule engine library for Go, inspired by JBoss Drools but implemented in a simpler manner. It provides its own Domain-Specific Language (DSL) called GRL (Grule Rule Language) for defining rules and supports features such as rule evaluation with salience, fact manipulation through reflection, and RETE algorithm optimization for efficient rule matching. Grule is well-suited for Go developers building rule-based decision logic into their applications.

Key Features:

• Custom DSL (GRL) for defining rules in a structured, readable format
• RETE algorithm optimization for efficient pattern matching and execution
• Rule salience (priority) for controlling execution order
• Reflection-based fact handling for flexible data binding
• Built-in functions and variadic function calling
• Cycle counting to prevent infinite loops (configurable max cycles)
• Apache 2.0 license for unrestricted use and redistribution

Pros:

• Lightweight and designed for the Go ecosystem with minimal overhead
• Simpler learning curve than Drools while offering similar core capabilities
• Efficient execution for medium-to-large rule sets
• Actively maintained with stable releases (v1.x)
• Good performance through RETE-based optimization

Cons:

• Go-only—no cross-language or multi-platform support
• No visual UI for rule authoring; rules are defined in GRL or programmatically
• No native workflow orchestration or approval flows
• No built-in versioning, audit trails, or governance tooling
• Smaller community and ecosystem compared to Drools or Microsoft RulesEngine

‍

gRule vs. Nected

Grule fits Go-centric teams. Nected provides a full BRMS with workflow, governance, and multi-language support.

8. Pyke

Pyke is frequently described as a “knowledge-based inference engine for Python with forward-chaining and backward-chaining.” That description is misleading for modern adopters. Pyke was a Python-based expert system that implemented logic programming (inspired by Prolog), but the project has been unmaintained for over a decade.

Reality check:

• Last release: April 2010 (v1.1.1). The project has had no meaningful updates for over 14 years.
• Not actively maintained. A 2013 Google Groups thread confirmed the last commits were in 2010; the project is effectively abandonware.
• Limited production suitability. The “forward and backward chaining” is academic in nature and not designed for today’s cloud-native, high-throughput, governance-heavy use cases.
• No ecosystem. No integrations, no modern security model, no compliance tooling, and no community momentum.

Pyke may have been innovative in its time, but it is not a viable choice for new rule engine implementations in 2026.

Key Features (as documented, but dated):

• Forward-chaining and backward-chaining inference (theoretical support)
• Knowledge bases defined using Python syntax
• Compilation of knowledge bases into Python bytecode
• Dynamic creation and modification of facts and rules at runtime
• Originally designed for expert systems and decision support

Pros (historical):

• Pure Python implementation with no external dependencies
• Novel approach to combining declarative and procedural logic
• Documentation and examples available (though outdated)

Cons:

• Unmaintained since 2010—no security patches or compatibility updates
• Not suitable for production use in 2026
• No visual UI, no cloud deployment, no modern integrations
• Python 2-era design; compatibility with modern Python is uncertain
• Community and support are effectively nonexistent

Pykey vs. Nected

Pyke is legacy and unsuitable for new projects. Nected offers a modern, maintained platform with full BRMS capabilities.

9. Microsoft RulesEngine (.NET)

Microsoft RulesEngine is a fast and reliable open-source .NET library for building rule-based systems. It is published by Microsoft under the MIT license and available on GitHub at microsoft/RulesEngine, with over 4.1k stars. The library abstracts business logic and rules outside of core system logic, allowing rules to be stored and modified independently without affecting the main codebase.

What is actually open source: The microsoft/RulesEngine repository on GitHub—the entire .NET library. It evaluates rules defined in JSON, supports workflows with multiple rules, custom C# expressions, scoped/global/local parameters, and post-rule execution actions. It also includes a standalone expression evaluator. This is the full open-source offering.

What is not open source: There is no UI, no BRMS, no workflow designer, and no managed service. It’s a library you embed in your application. Azure Logic Apps, Power Automate, and other Microsoft services are separate, proprietary products and are not part of the RulesEngine project.

Bottom line: You get a solid, open-source rule evaluation engine—nothing more. Governance, authoring, versioning, and deployment remain your responsibility.

Key Features (open-source library):

• JSON-based rules and workflow definition
• Multiple input support with custom naming capabilities
• Dynamic object input support
• C# expression support for conditions and actions
• Custom class/type injection for extending expressions
• Scoped, global, and local parameters
• Post-rule execution actions
• Standalone expression evaluator
• Targets .NET 6.0 and .NET Standard 2.0

Pros:

• Fully open source under MIT license
• Actively maintained by Microsoft
• Clean API and good performance
• Comprehensive documentation, wiki, and unit tests
• Integrates natively with .NET applications

Cons:

• Library only—no BRMS, no visual authoring, no managed service
• Versioning, audit trails, and governance must be built in-house
• No direct DB or API connectors; integration is via your application code
• .NET ecosystem only; no cross-platform or multi-language support

‍

Microsoft RulesEngine vs Nected

10. RuleBook

RuleBook is a simple, lightweight rules engine designed for Java that leverages Java 8 features. It was created as an alternative to more complex rule engines like Drools and Easy Rules, using a Chain of Responsibility pattern with syntactic sugar to reduce ceremony. RuleBook provides a given/when/then Domain Specific Language (DSL) that allows rules to be defined independently while remaining chainable and capable of sharing state from one rule to the next.

Key Features:

• Given/when/then DSL for intuitive rule definition
• Two rule definition approaches: Java DSL and POJO-based rules (annotations)
• Chain of Responsibility pattern for rule execution flow
• Annotations: @Rule, @When, @Then, @Given for POJO rules
• Lambda syntax support for conditions and actions
• Lightweight design with minimal dependencies

Pros:

• Simple API that facilitates quick setup and integration
• “Just Java”—no new languages or complex frameworks to learn
• Less ceremony than Drools; easier for teams unfamiliar with dedicated rule engines
• Supports both fluent DSL and POJO-based rule definition
• Suitable for projects with straightforward to moderate rule processing needs

Cons:

• Limited to basic rule patterns; not designed for complex inference or large rule sets
• No visual UI for rule authoring—rules are defined in code
• No native workflow orchestration or approval flows
• No built-in versioning, audit trails, or governance
• Java-only; no cross-language or multi-platform support

RuleBook Vs Nected

RuleBook is good for lightweight, code-centric rule logic in Java. Nected offers a full BRMS with governance, workflow, and non-technical usability.

Read Also: Top 10 Business Rules Engine 2026

How to Choose the Best Business Rules Management System?

Decision Framework

1. Assess complexity and scale: Large rule sets and complex logic favor engines with advanced capabilities, scalability, and observability. Simpler use cases may tolerate lighter tools.‍
2. Evaluate team and resources: Consider your team’s expertise and bandwidth for implementation and maintenance. Steep learning curves and high setup effort impact timelines.‍
3. Integration needs: Ensure compatibility with your stack: APIs, databases, message queues, and deployment model. Native connectors reduce custom glue code.‍
4. Governance and compliance: For regulated industries, prioritize audit trails, versioning, maker-checker, and compliance certifications (SOC 2, ISO, GDPR).‍
5. Future-proofing: Choose platforms that support rule evolution, scaling, and new requirements without costly migrations.‍
6. Licensing and cost: Understand licensing (OSS vs proprietary), TCO, and any hidden costs (hosting, support, integrations).

When Open Source Fits?

• Dynamic rules with frequent changes and strong in-house expertise
• Need for code transparency and customization
• Willingness to build and maintain authoring, versioning, and audit tooling

When a Managed BRMS Fits?

• Customer-facing or mission-critical flows
• Need for non-technical rule authorship and governance
• Preference for predictable costs, SLAs, and compliance out of the box

Conclusion

Open-source rules engines offer transparency, flexibility, and no upfront licensing fees. They remain a good fit for technical teams with the capacity to build and maintain the full stack—authoring, versioning, governance, and deployment.

For many organizations, however, the long-term cost of ownership, compliance requirements, and need for business-user empowerment make modern, managed BRMS platforms more attractive. The BRMS market’s shift toward cloud deployment (68%+ share) and the rise of AI-augmented decisioning reflect this trend.

Whether you stay with open source or migrate to a platform like Nected, the right choice depends on your complexity, team skills, governance needs, and strategic priorities. Use the comparisons and decision framework above to align your selection with your goals.

FAQs

When should I switch from an open-source rule engine to a modern platform like Nected?

Switch when: rule changes require developers for every update; governance and compliance matter (audit trails, versioning, maker-checker, rollback); non-technical users need to own rule logic; infra and maintenance costs are high; or you’re scaling customer-facing flows where uptime and SLAs matter. If several apply, a managed BRMS often delivers better long-term value.

Is it worth migrating from Drools or another open-source engine? What’s the ROI?

Open source is “free” in license, but TCO includes developer time, infrastructure, security, and maintenance. Many organizations find that after 12–24 months these costs exceed a managed platform, especially when business users can update rules without engineering. ROI improves with faster time-to-change, lower ops burden, and governance out of the box. If rules change rarely and your team is small and technical, open source can still fit. If rules change often and you need business ownership and compliance, migration often pays off.

How hard is it to migrate from Drools, Nools, or GoRules to Nected?

Drools/DRL: Rules are re-expressed in Nected’s visual builder; logic is preserved, but DRL doesn’t map 1:1. Nools / json-rules-engine: JSON-based rules map more easily. GoRules (ZEN): JDM/JSON models overlap conceptually. Nected supports Drools/KIE compatibility and import/export (CSV/JSON). Most teams run a parallel rollout—new rules in Nected, legacy in place—then migrate high-impact flows gradually.

Can I migrate my existing rules without rewriting everything?

There’s no automated DRL-to-Nected conversion. Rules are reauthored, but logic can be preserved. Nected offers import/export, visual rule builder, and complex condition support. Migrate high-value, frequently changing rules first; leave stable logic for later. A migration checklist (conditions, actions, priorities, data sources) helps avoid gaps.

What are the hidden costs of open-source rule engines?

Hidden costs: developer time (changes, deployment, governance); infrastructure (hosting, scaling); security and compliance (hardening, patching, audit tooling); integration work; training; ongoing maintenance. Managed platforms absorb much of this, which is why TCO often favors them for customer-facing or mission-critical flows.

Why are companies moving away from Drools and other open-source engines?

Developer bottleneck (changes tied to sprints), cloud expectations (managed scaling, observability), governance (audit trails, approvals, rollback), non-technical ownership (analysts can’t edit DRL/JSON), and cost rebalancing (managed pricing looks better as infra and labor rise). Drools still fits Java-heavy, eng-led teams; customer-facing and regulated flows increasingly move to low-code platforms with built-in governance.

Open source vs. managed rule engine: which is better for my use case?

Open source fits: infrequent rule changes, technical team, self-hosting capacity, light governance. Managed (e.g., Nected) fits: frequent changes, non-technical authors, customer-facing/mission-critical flows, need for audit trails/versioning/maker-checker, or desire to avoid infra overhead. Trade-off: control (open source) vs. speed, governance, and lower ops (managed).

Is Pyke still maintained? Can I use it in 2026?

No. Last release April 2010 (v1.1.1). Unmaintained for 14+ years—effectively abandonware. Not recommended. For Python rule logic, consider Nected (API-based), json-rules-engine, or other actively maintained libraries.

What part of Microsoft RulesEngine is open source?

The microsoft/RulesEngine repo on GitHub is fully open source (MIT)—a .NET library for JSON-defined rules, workflows, and expressions. Not included: UI, BRMS, workflow designer, managed service. It’s an embedded library; you build authoring, versioning, and governance. Azure Logic Apps and Power Automate are separate products.

‍